Choosing the Right Brake Fluid: Ate Typ 200 vs Motul Rbf 660 for Fade Resistance and Track Days

When it comes to performance driving, the choice of brake fluid can significantly impact your vehicle’s braking performance, especially during track days. Two popular options among enthusiasts are ATE Typ 200 and Motul RBF 660. This article will explore the characteristics, advantages, and considerations of each fluid to help you make an informed decision.

Understanding Brake Fluid

Brake fluid is crucial for the hydraulic braking system of a vehicle. It transfers force from the brake pedal to the brake calipers, allowing the vehicle to slow down or stop. The effectiveness of brake fluid can be influenced by its boiling point, viscosity, and resistance to moisture absorption.

Ate Typ 200 Brake Fluid

ATE Typ 200 is a popular choice among track enthusiasts due to its high performance and fade resistance. It is a synthetic brake fluid with a high dry boiling point and good moisture resistance.

Key Features of ATE Typ 200

  • Dry Boiling Point: 536°F (280°C)
  • Wet Boiling Point: 401°F (205°C)
  • Type: DOT 4 fluid
  • Color: Red

With its high boiling points, ATE Typ 200 provides excellent resistance to brake fade, making it suitable for high-performance applications. Its red color also allows for easy identification.

Motul RBF 660 Brake Fluid

Motul RBF 660 is another highly regarded brake fluid that is designed specifically for racing and track use. It offers superior performance and is known for its ability to withstand extreme temperatures.

Key Features of Motul RBF 660

  • Dry Boiling Point: 617°F (325°C)
  • Wet Boiling Point: 401°F (205°C)
  • Type: DOT 4 fluid
  • Color: Clear

Motul RBF 660’s exceptionally high dry boiling point makes it one of the top choices for serious track enthusiasts. Its clear color allows for easy monitoring of fluid condition.

Comparative Analysis: ATE Typ 200 vs. Motul RBF 660

Both ATE Typ 200 and Motul RBF 660 are excellent brake fluids, but they cater to slightly different needs. Here’s a comparative analysis to help you choose the right one for your specific requirements.

Boiling Points

While both fluids have high boiling points, Motul RBF 660 has a clear advantage with a dry boiling point of 617°F compared to ATE Typ 200’s 536°F. This makes RBF 660 more suitable for extreme track conditions where overheating is a concern.

Moisture Resistance

Both fluids offer good moisture resistance, but ATE Typ 200 has a slightly higher wet boiling point. This means it can maintain performance better over time in humid conditions, making it a reliable choice for daily drivers as well as track use.

Cost and Availability

Cost can be a deciding factor for many users. ATE Typ 200 is generally more affordable than Motul RBF 660, making it a popular choice for those on a budget. However, the performance benefits of RBF 660 might justify the higher price for serious track enthusiasts.

Conclusion

Choosing between ATE Typ 200 and Motul RBF 660 ultimately depends on your specific driving needs and conditions. If you prioritize maximum performance on the track and can accommodate a higher budget, Motul RBF 660 is the way to go. However, for those seeking a balance of performance and cost, ATE Typ 200 is a solid choice that won’t disappoint.

Regardless of your choice, always ensure that your brake fluid is fresh and meets the requirements of your vehicle to maintain optimal braking performance.